John Swofford knew the ACC was in trouble. He knew the ACC’s
new television deal with ESPN placed the conference far behind the big four in
terms of revenue and prestige and he knew his best football programs had
wandering eyes and lust for SEC-like paydays.
Swofford had to be nervous. He had to be worried, but he’s
John Swofford – the original architect of conference expansion, the master poacher who pulled off the
addition of basketball powers Pittsburgh and Syracuse with nary a credible
leak; and he had a plan to secure his legacy and hold the ACC together – more
expansion.
Swofford knew
the ACC’s problem could be solved with more cash and the only way the ACC could wrangle more
dollars out of ESPN was to grow the ACC to 16.
Swofford reasoned that by adding two more to the ACC’s ranks
he could go back to ESPN and renegotiate the television contract to accommodate
the new members.
The only trouble was schools that would add the value needed
to bring the ACC on par with the Big 12’s pending television deal are few and
far between.
The obvious choice was Notre Dame. The Irish, despite not
making much of a splash in the last 20 years, have the prestige to add the big
dollars necessary to save the ACC.
Credible, but unconfirmed, reports suggest Swofford had been
in talks with Notre Dame and was willing to give the Irish almost anything they
wanted to lure them into the conference. Notre Dame was willing to listen but
reluctant to make any commitment before the BCS playoff formula is known.
The Irish value their independence and their television
revenues. Conventional wisdom said the only way the Irish join a conference as a football member is if the new BCS formula forces them to join.
That scenario doesn’t seem likely to happen and with reports sufacing this morning that Notre Dame is close to signing a deal with NBC/Comcast to extend their television contract it seems more and more likely the Irish will stay independent.
If Notre Dame was to be the savior of the ACC what does John
Swofford do now?
One thing he doesn’t do is give up. Swofford has
reached out to other high-value teams in the Big 12 and SEC but every one of those schools declined.
The question is what does Swofford do now?
Miscellany
Jim Lamar takes an exhaustive look at FSU’s ACC revenues.
Lamar’s story can be read online at http://www.tallahassee.com/article/20120612/FSU03/120612002/FSU-s-take-from-ACC-2011-12-16-85-million?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|frontpage&nclick_check=1
One interesting fact in Lamar’s article is the notation
that:
"The ACC also distributed $167,400.58 from its reserves to each school."
I’m wondering how often that disbursement occurs or if it
was a special attempt to inflate
the monetary disbursement the ACC handed out.
I’m also wondering how the Big 12 stacks up against the ACC
in terms disbursements item by item.
Don’t expect to learn anything from the Clemson Board of
Trustee’s teleconference tonight other than Dabo is against the move.
I continue to say the ACC could put a fork in all the
speculation on FSU and Clemson by simply releasing details of their new TV
contract. If the TV contract starts out at $13 or $14 million and takes 9 years
to reach a $17 million payout we may have a smoking gun to explain once and for
all why ACC schools are reaching out to other conferences.
The ACC has done a poor job of public relations. Sure they’ve had a few journalists
preach the party line but they fail to understand that perception is reality.
Sometimes perception is really reality -- one case in point is the attempt to
rebrand the ACC as a football oriented conference.
Take a look at the chart below:
| School | 5 Y W-L | 10 Y W-L | BCS | Football Grade |
| Boston College | 39-27 | 84-45 | 0-0 | C+ |
| Clemson | 41-26 | 79-50 | 0-1 | C |
| Duke | 16-44 | 25-93 | 0-0 | F |
| Florida State | 42-24 | 85-46 | 0-1 | C+ |
| Georgia Tech | 41-25 | 78-52 | 0-1 | C |
| Maryland | 27-36 | 67-58 | 0-0 | D |
| Miami | 34-29 | 82-44 | 2-1 | B- |
| North Carolina | 35-29 | 54-69 | 0-0 | F |
| NC State | 33-30 | 67-58 | 0-0 | D |
| Pittsburgh | 38-26 | 74-51 | 0-0 | C- |
| Syracuse | 22-39 | 43-77 | 0-0 | F |
| Virginia | 29-33 | 66-59 | 0-0 | F |
| Virginia Tech | 53-16 | 102-37 | 1-5 | A |
| Wake Forest | 31-32 | 62-60 | 0-1 | D |
| West Virginia | 48-17 | 95-33 | 3-0 | A |
I after compiling that simple chart I understand now why Pittsburgh was considered a football addition by many in the ACC. It's not that Pittsburgh has been good, it's that ACC football has been terrible.
Look at the W-L for a 5 and 10 year period and tell me the ACC is football centric conference with a straight face.
WVU was added as a comparison.
WVU was added as a comparison.
I'm going to be away for the next four days with little or no access. My silence is not backtracking or hiding..
Dang it Chris, you can't go out of town without your laptop.
ReplyDeleteI think if you did a similar chart for every other conference, the ACC wouldn't really look much worse in comparison.
ReplyDelete