Last week FSU gave a classic non-denial. They used rhetoric
to say much about nothing.
Nothing was said, but it was an important nothing.
They did not pledge allegiance to the ACC.
They did not back away from the Big 12.
They said all the right things to remain non-committed and
open to available opportunities.
Somehow FSU’s positioning was interpreted as backing away
from the Big 12 – that interpretation is wrong, but I can understand why so
many understood it that way.
Expectations blossomed in the days leading up to the Board
of Trustees meeting with rumors of an impending announcement by the Seminoles
confirming their interest in the Big 12 – that didn’t happen. It couldn’t
happen because the conference expansion line of demarcation hadn’t been
crossed.
A line of demarcation is a boundary – a line that is often
used to separates temporary geopolitical borders – like the boundary between
the Big 12 and ACC.
If you think of an invitation to join the Big 12 as that
imaginary line of demarcation its easy to understand why FSU choose to play
coy.
FSU would be foolish to make any comment officially declaring
their love of the Big 12(‘s money).
They do not have an offer to join the Big 12.
They will have that offer soon -- maybe as soon as July 1st
when WVU and TCU become voting members in the Big 12 and Bob Bowlsby is
officially in office—maybe even sooner; think after the June 20th
BCS meeting.
And when that offer is made FSU will accept and bring Clemson with them to the Big 12.
FSU is telling some that a move for 2013 is unlikely. They
are telling the media a move in 2014 is more realistic.
Privately FSU is telling the Big 12 they will have
everything in order to notify the ACC of their departure by the August 15th
deadline.
FSU assured Big 12 members the move was still on track over the weekend.
FSU assured Big 12 members the move was still on track over the weekend.
Despite the obvious signals the doubt of the pending move
lingers, especially among those with allegiance to the ACC.
Their doubt comes from FSU’s vanishing budget deficit and
the rhetorical comments made by FSU at the end of last week.
They forget this has never been about FSU’s small budget
deficient or how the ACC found some extra BCS money to balance the
Seminole spreadsheet.
This is about the college football arm’s race. This is about
FSU being able to at least stay in the neighborhood with SEC teams who have the
means to outspend them in everything from facilities to coaching salaries.
This is about Jimbo Fisher having $500,000 a year to spend
on recruiting and money to retain his staff.
This is about the ACC’s champion being forced to play the 3rd
of 4th finisher in one of the 4 power conferences in the Orange Bowl
or perhaps even partnering with the Big East or Conference USA.
This is about the new ACC contract that takes 9 years to
reach the $17 million payout promised.
This is about the future of FSU football.
Miscellany
Swofford is working hard to save the conference and extract
more money from ESPN. The only way Swofford can reopen the talks is to expand
and the only team on the market that adds the value the ACC needs is Notre
Dame. Rumors of what Swofford is offering Notre Dame would tear the conference
apart.
Why hasn’t the Big 12 extended an invitation to FSU and
Clemson? Conflicting information from equally credible sources muddy the waters
on this one. Texas holding out hope for Notre Dame is plausible especially with
the BCS playoff format potentially forcing ND into a conference, but if the SEC
and Big 12 get their way Notre Dame will have a way into the playoff without
conference affiliation. Equally plausible is the notion that the Big 12 is
waiting on Bowlsby taking office and for West Virginia and TCU to become voting
members.
What doesn’t make sense is that FSU isn’t ready with the
paperwork. FSU commissioned a study on travel costs for Big 12 membership and if they have went that far they
have their paperwork in order.
Did anyone notice Eric Barron’s “talking points” listed Big
12 revenue as $22 million? Where did you hear that before? What Barron didn’t
tell the FSU BoT’s (but they know) is that the ACC contract pays only $13
million in 2012 and goes up $500K each year until it hits $17 million in 2021.
Why would FSU conduct a study on travel costs? I thought travel costs were absorbed by the Big 12 conference?
ReplyDeleteThey are not. Travel is not an issue.
ReplyDeleteThey all are just blowing carbon monoxide up everybody's A$$ES. I'm sure that FSU and Clemson already know for a fact what they are going to do. Here is what they ain't going to do. Neither school is going to stand still and let swofford ruin their football first status. Both schools will leave the acc high and dry before either will even consider waiting for swofford to dig up more money. swofford and his cronies can't dig that deep.
ReplyDeleteWhat are the details of the ND deal that could tear the ACC apart if Swofford gets his way?
ReplyDeleteAlso worth noting that the Big 12's 22 million is only for Tier 1 and Tier 2. Kansas makes almost 10 million additional on it's tier 3 (Texas makes even more). My assumption would be FSU would make at least that.
ReplyDeleteYour assumption would be incorrect. If Kansas already makes $10 million on its Tier 3 rights, Florida State makes that money already. Tier 3 rights in football and men's basketball include one football game and four men's basketball games. All other Tier 3 rights are controlled by the schools in both the ACC and the Big 12.
DeleteThere is ZERO chance Kansas made $10 million off the television rights for a football game against McNeese State (that didn't sell out) and basketball games against Towson, Florida Atlantic, Howard and North Dakota. I would be surprised if Kansas made anything million off those oh-so-valuable Tier 3 rights.
What's going to happen is simple. August 15 will come. August 15 will go. Florida State and Clemson will still be members of the ACC.
DeleteIt's not an assumption. Kansas makes $9 million off its tier three rights. It includes a football game, some basketball games, coaches shows, (I think) radio broadcasts, etc. However, Kansas is a special case because of the rabid basketball fanbase. As a result their tier three rights are more valuable.
DeleteWith the new ACC contract all basketball and football games belong to the conference and do not go back to the schools to package with their tier 3 rights. Assuming FSU can get something between what Kansas ($9 mil) and Texas ($15 mil) get for their tier 3 rights then that is a lot of money FSU would leave on the table by staying in the ACC.
No, it isn't. You forget that Florida State retains Tier 3 rights for coaches' shows, radio broadcasts, etc. That's included in Kansas' $9 million. All that Florida State doesn't have rights to is one football game and four basketball games.
DeleteSo no, it's not much money Florida State would leave on the table. Florida State is already making that money in the ACC.